Cayman remains the leading domicile for hedge and digital-asset funds, but with that stature comes stringent anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorist financing (CFT) and counter-proliferation financing (CPF) obligations. Regulated mutual funds and private funds are expected to implement a risk-based AML framework aligned with CIMA’s Guidance Notes and the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations (AMLRs).
Every Cayman fund must appoint natural persons as:
These roles can be outsourced to qualified providers, but the fund and its operators retain ultimate responsibility.
Funds must maintain proportionate AML/CFT/CPF policies covering: governance, risk assessment, onboarding, ongoing monitoring, sanctions screening, record-keeping, training, reliance/outsourcing, and independent testing. CIMA’s Guidance Notes set the benchmark expectations across all financial service providers.
Before establishing a business relationship or processing a one-off transaction, a fund must conduct CDD on investors (and controllers/beneficial owners), apply enhanced due diligence where risks are higher (e.g., PEPs, complex structures), verify source of funds/wealth where appropriate, and screen against applicable UN/UK sanctions lists. Ongoing monitoring is required throughout the lifecycle of the relationship.
Managers and administrators must monitor subscriptions/redemptions and transactional patterns to identify anomalies. The MLRO/DMLRO must maintain SAR processes and liaise with the FRA where warranted.
AMLRs require an effective risk-based independent audit function to test the adequacy and effectiveness of the AML program. Findings should be reported to the board/operators with remediation tracked to completion.
Directors, officers, employees, and relevant service providers must receive periodic AML training appropriate to their roles, with attendance and comprehension recorded.
Maintain CDD and transaction records for the prescribed periods (typically at least five years after the end of the relationship or completion of a transaction), ensuring they can be produced promptly to competent authorities.
CIMA’s corporate governance guidance for regulated mutual and private funds expects operators (directors/general partner/managing member) to oversee the AML framework, ensure resourcing is adequate, review periodic AML reports, and challenge the service providers where necessary. Minutes should evidence this oversight.
Many funds delegate onboarding and monitoring to their independent administrator. That’s permitted, but not a transfer of responsibility, the fund remains accountable for compliance, must approve the administrator’s AML policy, and should agree clear SLAs, KPIs, and reporting (e.g., hits on sanctions/PEP screening, EDD volumes, open exceptions, SAR statistics).
For funds with crypto exposures, CIMA’s Guidance Notes include sector-specific guidance (e.g., VASPs), emphasizing source-of-funds/wealth verification, blockchain analytics where appropriate, and heightened monitoring of high-risk geographies and counterparties.
Launching on the CV5 platform gives managers an institutional AML framework from day one:
Cayman’s AML regime is comprehensive and risk-based. Funds that operationalize the officer roles, CDD, monitoring, independent testing, and training will meet both regulatory and allocator expectations, and avoid costly remediation.
Ready to launch or upgrade your AML framework? Contact [email protected] and we’ll help you deploy a compliant, investor-ready Cayman fund.