The choice between offering different currency share classes (e.g., USD, EUR, GBP) or hedging currency exposure back to a base currency (e.g., from EUR into USD) depends on your hedge fund’s structure, investor base, and operational preferences.
Each approach has distinct advantages and trade-offs:
Option 1: Multiple Currency Share Classes
Pros
Investor Convenience: Investors can subscribe in their preferred currency, avoiding FX costs on entry/exit.
Marketing Appeal: Especially useful for European, UK, and Asian investors who may want to minimize FX exposure.
NAV Clarity: Each currency class has its own NAV, giving investors a clear performance picture in their own currency.
Cons
Operational Complexity: Requires separate accounting and reporting for each class.
Increased Admin Costs: Fund administrator must maintain parallel NAVs and potentially apply currency hedging at the share class level.
Fragmented Liquidity: Smaller AUM per share class can dilute fund efficiency and may complicate performance tracking and reporting.
Option 2: Single Base Currency with Currency Hedging
Typically, the fund is denominated in one base currency (e.g., USD), and currency hedging is used to protect foreign investors (e.g., EUR investors) from FX fluctuations.
Pros
Centralized Liquidity & NAV: Easier portfolio and liquidity management.
Simplified Operations: Only one NAV and no need to manage multiple share classes.
Professional Appearance: Shows that FX risk is actively managed, which can appeal to institutional investors.
Cons
Hedging Costs & Slippage: Currency hedging strategies (e.g., FX forwards or NDFs) have costs that can erode performance.
Imperfect Hedge Risk: Hedging might not fully protect against FX volatility, especially during large inflows/outflows or extreme market moves.
Investor Confusion: Investors may not fully understand how hedging works or how it affects their returns.